I can’t tell, since I can’t see that particular comment. I’ve inferred that “number” by some boundary testing, inputting various URLs to see which ones worked and which breaked.
I see—playing with http:// lesswrong.com/comments?count=50&after=t1_[comment-ID] seems to suggest 1rvj may be responsible, as http://lesswrong.com/comments?count=50&after=t1_1rvj has 1rvi as the first visible. That said, http://lesswrong.com/comments?count=50&after=t1_1rxo works where http://lesswrong.com/comments?count=50&after=t1_1rxn fails, which suggests 1rw8 breaks the page, too.
Edit: At least on my viewer—other people may have their Recent Comments set to show fewer comments.
I can’t tell, since I can’t see that particular comment. I’ve inferred that “number” by some boundary testing, inputting various URLs to see which ones worked and which breaked.
I see—playing with http:// lesswrong.com/comments?count=50&after=t1_[comment-ID] seems to suggest 1rvj may be responsible, as http://lesswrong.com/comments?count=50&after=t1_1rvj has 1rvi as the first visible. That said, http://lesswrong.com/comments?count=50&after=t1_1rxo works where http://lesswrong.com/comments?count=50&after=t1_1rxn fails, which suggests 1rw8 breaks the page, too.
Edit: At least on my viewer—other people may have their Recent Comments set to show fewer comments.