TGGP, your question illustrates nicely my explanation for why more history than futurism.
This book review claims that the majority position in philosophy rejects the dualism Constant and Eliezer object to—this is most certainly not a dispute between philosophers and scientists.
TGGP, your question illustrates nicely my explanation for why more history than futurism.
This book review claims that the majority position in philosophy rejects the dualism Constant and Eliezer object to—this is most certainly not a dispute between philosophers and scientists.