You might want to analyse statements “P” as meaning/being equivalent to “P is true,” but I am not going to include any explication of “true” in my epistemology for that analysis to anchor itself to
Analysing P as “P is true” isn’t some peculiarity of mine: in less formal terms, to assert something is to assert it as true. To put forward claims, and persuade others that they should believe them is to play a truth game...truth is what one should believe,
So your epistemology can’t dispense with truth, but offers no analysis of truth, How useful is that?
Continuing the above, part of what I am doing is tabooing “truth,” to see if we can formulate an epistemology-like framework without it.
Tabooing truth, or tabooing “truth”? It is almost always possible to stop using a word, but continue referring to the concept by synonymous words or phrases. Doing without the concept is harder....doing without the use, the employment us harder still.
What “truly works” is more of a feeling or a proclivity than a proposition, until of course an agent develops amodel of what works and why.
Nothing works just because someone feels it does. The truth of something truly working us given by the territory.
What is right is contextual truth.
I agree with you here absolutely, modulo vocabulary. I would rather say that no single framework is universally appropriate (problem of induction)
Analysing P as “P is true” isn’t some peculiarity of mine: in less formal terms, to assert something is to assert it as true. To put forward claims, and persuade others that they should believe them is to play a truth game...truth is what one should believe,
So your epistemology can’t dispense with truth, but offers no analysis of truth, How useful is that?
Tabooing truth, or tabooing “truth”? It is almost always possible to stop using a word, but continue referring to the concept by synonymous words or phrases. Doing without the concept is harder....doing without the use, the employment us harder still.
Nothing works just because someone feels it does. The truth of something truly working us given by the territory.
Contextual truth is compatible with no truth?