Do we know on what basis the NIH classified this as not GoF research? It might be worth separating out “the NIH uses unexpected/weird/just-plain-wrong criteria” from “the NIH’s criteria are not being applied correctly in this case”.
I don’t know on what basis the NIH made that classification or when it made it. If someone knows I would be interested in reading the underlying NIH analysis.
While I could have linked to the more political claims I decided against it, to keep the politics in the question to the minimum.
Do we know on what basis the NIH classified this as not GoF research? It might be worth separating out “the NIH uses unexpected/weird/just-plain-wrong criteria” from “the NIH’s criteria are not being applied correctly in this case”.
I don’t know on what basis the NIH made that classification or when it made it. If someone knows I would be interested in reading the underlying NIH analysis.
While I could have linked to the more political claims I decided against it, to keep the politics in the question to the minimum.
I agree that trying to keep politics out of it as far as possible was a wise move.