Scott is brilliant, funny, and has posted extremely original and creative ideas on his blog. But he has revealed a surprisingcluelessness about matters of science and philosophy considering the amount of time he spends thinking about them. The Bloggingheads conversation can include religion, evolution, and affirmations.
Scott Adams—http://dilbert.com/blog/
Scott is brilliant, funny, and has posted extremely original and creative ideas on his blog. But he has revealed a surprising cluelessness about matters of science and philosophy considering the amount of time he spends thinking about them. The Bloggingheads conversation can include religion, evolution, and affirmations.
Does he still have a problem talking?
No
probably because he draws cartoons for a living, rather than doing real science. Sounds like this debate could be a waste of time.
Would be excellent! I’m sure EY and SA could find a large set of topics on which they disagree.
yes but would they just talk past each other? A useful debate is one where there is disagreement, but that disagreement is actually resolved.