This is still clear as mud. What is the “refutation” actually claiming to refute?
Edit: Your post talks about a “Many Gods” refutation of something unstated, and asks the question of whether instrumental convergence refutes the refutation of the something unstated, and goes on to suggest that the refutation of the refutation of the something unstated may be refuted by a butterfly effect.
This is still clear as mud. What is the “refutation” actually claiming to refute?
Edit: Your post talks about a “Many Gods” refutation of something unstated, and asks the question of whether instrumental convergence refutes the refutation of the something unstated, and goes on to suggest that the refutation of the refutation of the something unstated may be refuted by a butterfly effect.
Can you see how this might not be entirely clear?
What I’m fixated on is a non Superintelligent AI using acausal blackmail. The would be what the many gods refutation is used for.