I’m just reading the book right now after seeing Foseti’s review the other day. (The book is easy to find online.) However, I’m already familiar with most of its arguments from other sources.
This whole topic is a very deep rabbit hole, and an attempt to study it in-depth quickly leads to a baffling situation where on many questions, all respectable sources are silent or clearly wrong or incoherent, while tantalizing clues are provided by various sources that are completely obscure or (often not without good reason) utterly disreputable. But I don’t think it’s a topic for which LW would be a good discussion venue in any case.
I’m just reading the book right now after seeing Foseti’s review the other day. (The book is easy to find online.) However, I’m already familiar with most of its arguments from other sources.
This whole topic is a very deep rabbit hole, and an attempt to study it in-depth quickly leads to a baffling situation where on many questions, all respectable sources are silent or clearly wrong or incoherent, while tantalizing clues are provided by various sources that are completely obscure or (often not without good reason) utterly disreputable. But I don’t think it’s a topic for which LW would be a good discussion venue in any case.