Is there some way I can see all the posts I upvoted in 2018 so I can figure out which I think are worthy of nomination?
Not currently – I agree that’d be a good feature, although there’s probably a few other comparably good features worth building to improve the nomination UI experience and not sure if I’d get to them all this year.
Is the idea to only include in the review those posts which are almost universally regarded as “epistemically sound”?
I’m not sure exactly, but I’d at least want clearer epistemic flags on things. (I can imagine a case where there are some posts that seem clearly important, but still have some questionable claims, and the author hasn’t have time to update them. In that case, one option might be to include the work as-is, but follow it up with some commentary, either from a reviewer during the Review Phase or by one of the moderation team member).
Not currently – I agree that’d be a good feature, although there’s probably a few other comparably good features worth building to improve the nomination UI experience and not sure if I’d get to them all this year.
I’m not sure exactly, but I’d at least want clearer epistemic flags on things. (I can imagine a case where there are some posts that seem clearly important, but still have some questionable claims, and the author hasn’t have time to update them. In that case, one option might be to include the work as-is, but follow it up with some commentary, either from a reviewer during the Review Phase or by one of the moderation team member).