Meh… In a way, this entire site is dedicated to evangelism of skepticism (and, therefore, atheism).
No it isn’t. It’s a rationality site… which actually puts it at odds with skepticism when it comes to approach and some major conclusions. It is that same rationality which mandates that even if people on the site go ahead and evangelism atheism on the side they do so while acknowledging that most people would be better off getting off the pulpit and living their lives.
It’s a rationality site… which actually puts it at odds with skepticism when it comes to approach and some major conclusions.
How so ? The site promotes (one might say, “evangelizes”) rational thinking, especially the Bayes Rule, and evidence-based reasoning in general. These are the core values of skepticism; disbelief in fairies/UFOs/gods/etc. is merely a consequence.
Number theory and numerology both have number as a core principle. This doesn’t make them the same thing. Look for where they differ, and you might spot why they differ.
For most part they would also do well to eschew evangelism.
Meh… In a way, this entire site is dedicated to evangelism of skepticism (and, therefore, atheism). I’m ok with that.
No it isn’t. It’s a rationality site… which actually puts it at odds with skepticism when it comes to approach and some major conclusions. It is that same rationality which mandates that even if people on the site go ahead and evangelism atheism on the side they do so while acknowledging that most people would be better off getting off the pulpit and living their lives.
How so ? The site promotes (one might say, “evangelizes”) rational thinking, especially the Bayes Rule, and evidence-based reasoning in general. These are the core values of skepticism; disbelief in fairies/UFOs/gods/etc. is merely a consequence.
Number theory and numerology both have number as a core principle. This doesn’t make them the same thing. Look for where they differ, and you might spot why they differ.