You threw in an “Autonomous” instead of “Type 1″ in the middle there. Apart from being a lousy name (just don’t think the association is at all right) it made me assume that you were introducing a new type. Particularly because the previous sentence said you were moving to a 3-type classification!
He uses “Autonomous” for Type 1. “Conscious” might work for Type 2.
You threw in an “Autonomous” instead of “Type 1″ in the middle there. Apart from being a lousy name (just don’t think the association is at all right) it made me assume that you were introducing a new type. Particularly because the previous sentence said you were moving to a 3-type classification!
Of course, if we think it’s exhaustive, we can just name one and call the other “non-” that...