This model explains non-locality in a straightforward manner. The entangled particles rely on the same bit of the encryption key, so when measurement occurs, the simulation of the universe updates immediately because the entangled particles rely on the same part of the secret key. As the universe is simulated, the speed of light limitation doesn’t play any role in this process.
Firstly, non-locality is pretty well understood. Eliezer has a series on quantum mechanics that I recommend.
You seem to have been sold the idea that quantum mechanics is a spooky thing that no one understands, probably from pop-sci.
Look up the bellman inequalities. The standard equations of quantum mechanics produce precise and correct probabilities. To make your theory be any good either.
Provide a new mathematical structure that predicts the same probabilities. Or
Provide an argument why non-locality still needs to be explained. If reality follows the equations of quantum mechanics, why do we need your theory as well? Aren’t the equations alone enough?
Firstly, non-locality is pretty well understood. Eliezer has a series on quantum mechanics that I recommend.
You seem to have been sold the idea that quantum mechanics is a spooky thing that no one understands, probably from pop-sci.
Look up the bellman inequalities. The standard equations of quantum mechanics produce precise and correct probabilities. To make your theory be any good either.
Provide a new mathematical structure that predicts the same probabilities. Or
Provide an argument why non-locality still needs to be explained. If reality follows the equations of quantum mechanics, why do we need your theory as well? Aren’t the equations alone enough?