The formatting issues this post had when it was first made.
There’s little content to your post beyond “here’s a website. I like it. Here are some links into it”—nothing about why you think it’s good, no information about the theories or evidence behind it, no information about who made it and why we should trust their advice on happiness, etc.
Why did this discussion post get such low karma?
I don’t know (and haven’t voted it either up or down), but here are some conjectures.
The red flags listed in Tim’s comment.
The formatting issues this post had when it was first made.
There’s little content to your post beyond “here’s a website. I like it. Here are some links into it”—nothing about why you think it’s good, no information about the theories or evidence behind it, no information about who made it and why we should trust their advice on happiness, etc.