Sociopath is a psychiatric diagnosis which has a very specific meaning; using it outside of that context, especially as a pejorative towards people you disagree with, dilutes and pollutes that meaning.
This is especially true here, where your “sociopaths” are evidently very good long-term planners capable of coordinating through trust (the “general predisposition” not to harm other “sociopaths”). Needless to say, these are not exactly typical sociopathic traits; several of the diagnostic criteria for sociopathy/psychopathy depend on their relative absence. There is little evidence to suggest that even so-called subcriminal sociopaths, such as are found in slightly elevated numbers in CEO positions, are as a rule much less impulsive or unreliable than the standard model.
In the dual interests of accuracy and minimizing the demonization of the mentally ill, can we agree to avoid using the term sociopath when “power-hungry asshole” is sufficient?
Sociopath is a psychiatric diagnosis which has a very specific meaning; using it outside of that context, especially as a pejorative towards people you disagree with, dilutes and pollutes that meaning.
This is especially true here, where your “sociopaths” are evidently very good long-term planners capable of coordinating through trust (the “general predisposition” not to harm other “sociopaths”). Needless to say, these are not exactly typical sociopathic traits; several of the diagnostic criteria for sociopathy/psychopathy depend on their relative absence. There is little evidence to suggest that even so-called subcriminal sociopaths, such as are found in slightly elevated numbers in CEO positions, are as a rule much less impulsive or unreliable than the standard model.
In the dual interests of accuracy and minimizing the demonization of the mentally ill, can we agree to avoid using the term sociopath when “power-hungry asshole” is sufficient?