As one moves to more and more diverse environments—that is, as N increases—this model suggests that x will dominate P−f(x)N, implying that mesa-optimization will become more and more favorable.
I believe this sentence should say ”x will dominate P−f(x)N+x, implying [...]”. Same for the sentence in the paper.
Ah, I see. I was thinking of ‘dominate’ as narrowly meaning ‘determines the total value of the term’, but I agree that the usage above works perfectly well.
I believe this sentence should say ”x will dominate P−f(x)N+x, implying [...]”. Same for the sentence in the paper.
I suppose it depends on what you mean by “dominate.” Mathematically, the point here is just that
limN→∞P−f(x)N+x=x
which I would describe as the x term “dominating” the P−f(x)N term.
Ah, I see. I was thinking of ‘dominate’ as narrowly meaning ‘determines the total value of the term’, but I agree that the usage above works perfectly well.