“If you object to consequentialist metaethical theories”
There is no such thing as a ‘consequentialist metaethical theory’.
Consequentialism is a first-order ethical theory.
While most people here despise philosophy (see here ), I do wonder how much people actually understand philosophy.
I think strictly speaking consequentalism is a property of first-order ethical theories. That is they either are consequentialist or are not. But it is not by itself a first-order theory.
Ah, that was a mistake- thanks for catching it.
“If you object to consequentialist metaethical theories”
There is no such thing as a ‘consequentialist metaethical theory’.
Consequentialism is a first-order ethical theory.
While most people here despise philosophy (see here ), I do wonder how much people actually understand philosophy.
I think strictly speaking consequentalism is a property of first-order ethical theories. That is they either are consequentialist or are not. But it is not by itself a first-order theory.
Ah, that was a mistake- thanks for catching it.