I disagree; I watched Eliezer vs Adam Frank, and at several points I paused it, trying to work out what I’d say in response to Frank’s arguments. I still found that Eliezer got across the counterarguments in a far neater way when I unpaused, and he had a lot less time than I did.
I have not observed that getting across counterarguments in a neat way is a particularly vital element of what it takes to ‘win’ a debate.
I have not observed that getting across counterarguments in a neat way is a particularly vital element of what it takes to ‘win’ a debate.