It’s just saying “the universe’s first cause possesses self-awareness and intentionality”, which as far as we can tell is impossible to prove or disprove.
I would still assume that someone who believes such weird hypothesis for no good reason probably also believes other things for no good reason.
(If there is no evidence either way, there is still Occam’s razor. If you ignore it, so be it, but I will assume that you also ignore it in other situations.)
I would still assume that someone who believes such weird hypothesis for no good reason probably also believes other things for no good reason.
(If there is no evidence either way, there is still Occam’s razor. If you ignore it, so be it, but I will assume that you also ignore it in other situations.)