I don’t think anyone even remotely close to understanding this fact would use it in that context.
I dispute this claim being called a “fact”, but I’m open to having my mind changed. Is there a clear explanation of this claim somewhere? I’ve read Lethalities and assorted bits of Nate’s writing.
I haven’t seen a clear explanation that I’d expect to change your mind. Some people understood a dynamic the claim refers to after reading the sharp left turn post (but most people I talked to didn’t, although I’m not sure whether they actually read it or just skimmed through it). If you haven’t read it, might be worth a try
I dispute this claim being called a “fact”, but I’m open to having my mind changed. Is there a clear explanation of this claim somewhere? I’ve read Lethalities and assorted bits of Nate’s writing.
I haven’t seen a clear explanation that I’d expect to change your mind. Some people understood a dynamic the claim refers to after reading the sharp left turn post (but most people I talked to didn’t, although I’m not sure whether they actually read it or just skimmed through it). If you haven’t read it, might be worth a try