The passive voice throws me. “I was coerced” reads as a pretty strong statement of fact about the universe; “this simply is.” I would have liked to hear, even in a brief summary paragraph, something more like “I was coerced by A, B, and C, via methods that included X, Y, and Z, into a frame where etc.”
It seems to me that you can’t expect a summary to make the claims as detailed as possible. You don’t criticize scientific papers either because their abstract doesn’t fully prove the claims it makes, that’s for what you have the full article.
It seems to me that you can’t expect a summary to make the claims as detailed as possible.
Just noting that this was explicitly addressed in a few places in my comment, and I believe I correctly compensated for it/took this truth into account. “Make the claims in the summary as detailed as possible” is not what I was recommending.
It seems to me that you can’t expect a summary to make the claims as detailed as possible. You don’t criticize scientific papers either because their abstract doesn’t fully prove the claims it makes, that’s for what you have the full article.
Just noting that this was explicitly addressed in a few places in my comment, and I believe I correctly compensated for it/took this truth into account. “Make the claims in the summary as detailed as possible” is not what I was recommending.