He lists a single “parasitic” non-profit, and then declares the entire field of non-profits to be corrupt thieves on the scale of the financial sector. This post is explicitly about his disgust with the “non-profit world”, and he pretty clearly believes that this sort of this is common despite providing no strong evidence in support of that belief. That is his mistake, generalizing from a single example with no additional evidence provided or even discussed.
By he I meant Vox. I read the linked post, and it makes all these mistakes. I wouldn’t expect a quote to include a full argument or evidence base, but the source ideally should.
Most quotes have a justification lurking about somewhere, either within the quote itself, or in shared experience. A quote that’s just an unsubstantiated claim shouldn’t be quoted.
Look closer. It’s a comment about organizations which exist mostly for the benefits of their employees. One might call them parasites.
He lists a single “parasitic” non-profit, and then declares the entire field of non-profits to be corrupt thieves on the scale of the financial sector. This post is explicitly about his disgust with the “non-profit world”, and he pretty clearly believes that this sort of this is common despite providing no strong evidence in support of that belief. That is his mistake, generalizing from a single example with no additional evidence provided or even discussed.
It’s a quote. Most quotes generalize and don’t provide or discuss evidence.
By he I meant Vox. I read the linked post, and it makes all these mistakes. I wouldn’t expect a quote to include a full argument or evidence base, but the source ideally should.
Most quotes have a justification lurking about somewhere, either within the quote itself, or in shared experience. A quote that’s just an unsubstantiated claim shouldn’t be quoted.
“Shared experience” is the most common, I think, and is conveniently unfalsifiable.