Why is a God that wants to remain invisible a more likely explanation than no God at all?
If you start with the thought, “Maybe God exists; maybe not.” and then notice that natural explanations are sufficient for all the phenomena you observe, then shouldn’t you move towards the “no God” hypothesis?
Why is a God that wants to remain invisible a more likely explanation than no God at all?
If you start with the thought, “Maybe God exists; maybe not.” and then notice that natural explanations are sufficient for all the phenomena you observe, then shouldn’t you move towards the “no God” hypothesis?