That is really interesting. But I can’t help but feel like I’m violating his privacy when I read that:
“Likewise, please do not mirror or duplicate this page.”
In light of that, it’s difficult for me to feel OK reading it on WayBack Machine...
I’m sure Eliezer knows that old stuff of his is on archive.org. If he wanted to, he could have it removed.
Indeed, information security is a process, not a status.
Duplicating the page, maybe, but he absolutely can’t forbid quoting it or linking to it; those actions’d fall under fair use in most cases.
(That is, if you care about copyright law at all.)
I was going to forward you the link I had to that page somewhere in the wild, but looks like my bookmark is to the wayback machine as well. Whoops...
That is really interesting. But I can’t help but feel like I’m violating his privacy when I read that:
In light of that, it’s difficult for me to feel OK reading it on WayBack Machine...
I’m sure Eliezer knows that old stuff of his is on archive.org. If he wanted to, he could have it removed.
Indeed, information security is a process, not a status.
Duplicating the page, maybe, but he absolutely can’t forbid quoting it or linking to it; those actions’d fall under fair use in most cases.
(That is, if you care about copyright law at all.)
I was going to forward you the link I had to that page somewhere in the wild, but looks like my bookmark is to the wayback machine as well. Whoops...