The absence of expected evidence is evidence of interference.
Ah, but it’s stronger evidence that your expectation is wrong; and self-reflective priors would have ‘expectation is wrong’ starting more likely than ‘interference from an outside agency’.
Ah, but it’s stronger evidence that your expectation is wrong
Keywordstronger. The claim you were questioning was whether there was evidence at all. I do nothing more than support the claim that it is evidence.
and self-reflective priors would have ‘expectation is wrong’ starting more likely than ‘interference from an outside agency’.
Probably, given roughly human-like intelligence with information roughly like what we have now. The counterfactual wasn’t specific in that regard but did suggest an assumption of a particularly strong understanding of human nature.
Ah, but it’s stronger evidence that your expectation is wrong; and self-reflective priors would have ‘expectation is wrong’ starting more likely than ‘interference from an outside agency’.
Keyword stronger. The claim you were questioning was whether there was evidence at all. I do nothing more than support the claim that it is evidence.
Probably, given roughly human-like intelligence with information roughly like what we have now. The counterfactual wasn’t specific in that regard but did suggest an assumption of a particularly strong understanding of human nature.