So to clarify, what’s “exactly backwards” is saying that to a good rationalist, “the statements ″ and ″ sound exactly alike.” Whereas I think an important part of being a good rationalist is being able to distinguish between the two. I’m not saying Yvain’s entire post is backwards.
So to clarify, what’s “exactly backwards” is saying that to a good rationalist, “the statements ″ and ″ sound exactly alike.” Whereas I think an important part of being a good rationalist is being able to distinguish between the two. I’m not saying Yvain’s entire post is backwards.
Fair enough, could you tell me what exactly it means to be a good rationalist?