This question is incoherent in my ontology.
Morality wrt the perspective of the earth or universe is undefined.
The evolution of humans from apes was good by human values and perhaps bad by ape values.
It has no independent moral value.
AI takeover would be bad by human values.
Strongly disagree—we’re still apes, and as long as we survive, we are a good outcome for the values of our ancestors. Our competing species cousins are probably quite salty at us, but we’ve done well by the standards of our pre-human forbears.
This question is incoherent in my ontology.
Morality wrt the perspective of the earth or universe is undefined.
The evolution of humans from apes was good by human values and perhaps bad by ape values.
It has no independent moral value.
AI takeover would be bad by human values.
Strongly disagree—we’re still apes, and as long as we survive, we are a good outcome for the values of our ancestors. Our competing species cousins are probably quite salty at us, but we’ve done well by the standards of our pre-human forbears.