Criticizing the use of Bayes Theorem because it’s 260 years old is such a weird take.
The Pythagorean theorem is literally thousands of years old. But it’s still useful, even though lots of progress has been made in trigonometry since then. Should we abandon a2+b2=c2, as a result?
This does seem like a laughable conclusion. Imagine the implications for the world if this line of reasoning became the accepted paradigm!
Though I’m hesitant to outright dismiss anyone willing to put in effort into writing a post, the author here really needs to rewrite their post to remove all the self-imposed absurdities.
Criticizing the use of Bayes Theorem because it’s 260 years old is such a weird take.
The Pythagorean theorem is literally thousands of years old. But it’s still useful, even though lots of progress has been made in trigonometry since then. Should we abandon a2+b2=c2, as a result?
This does seem like a laughable conclusion. Imagine the implications for the world if this line of reasoning became the accepted paradigm!
Though I’m hesitant to outright dismiss anyone willing to put in effort into writing a post, the author here really needs to rewrite their post to remove all the self-imposed absurdities.