I’m not blaming the mate bond for his behavior, what I’m really trying to say- and doing it badly- is that the mate bond is a stupid thing for it to group Demetri with Allirea as he seems incapable of change, and change he must for her to even consider any sort of loving relationship.
Though Allirea never really considered the mate bond, I think once she saw that he could see her she hated him immedietly and to me that means that she is also incapable of change, so why would the matebond group Demetri to her?
And also if Demetri is so unable to even process the thought that she doesn’t love him, then he is very stupid, and crazy and because he is such things why did the matebond bond him to somebody that doesn’t like those things?
I’m not very good at explaining my thoughts coherently, so this is probably a bunch of nothing that no one can understand.
It’s always problematic, though tempting, to infer that someone is incapable of change from the fact that they didn’t change in a particular context.
In any case, agreed that the matebond is stupid in the sense you mean. It doesn’t take the likely consequences of each case into account. Of course, even in the real world, people have all kinds of stupid urges in that sense.
I’m not blaming the mate bond for his behavior, what I’m really trying to say- and doing it badly- is that the mate bond is a stupid thing for it to group Demetri with Allirea as he seems incapable of change, and change he must for her to even consider any sort of loving relationship.
Though Allirea never really considered the mate bond, I think once she saw that he could see her she hated him immedietly and to me that means that she is also incapable of change, so why would the matebond group Demetri to her?
And also if Demetri is so unable to even process the thought that she doesn’t love him, then he is very stupid, and crazy and because he is such things why did the matebond bond him to somebody that doesn’t like those things?
I’m not very good at explaining my thoughts coherently, so this is probably a bunch of nothing that no one can understand.
It’s always problematic, though tempting, to infer that someone is incapable of change from the fact that they didn’t change in a particular context.
In any case, agreed that the matebond is stupid in the sense you mean. It doesn’t take the likely consequences of each case into account. Of course, even in the real world, people have all kinds of stupid urges in that sense.