There are a few videos taken from fighter-jet sensor packages floating around
The military released some videos but there’s plenty of reporting that it didn’t released their best-quality videos precisely for the reasons you listed. Having the best quality videos that are taking by fighter jets would reveal information about the fighter jets that the US military does not want out on the open so those high-quality videos are classified in a way the videos we have aren’t.
The kind of people who are in the know and who are qualified to interpret those videos are military personnel. People like David Charles Grusch.
There’s no good reason why someone like David Grusch should falsely tell Congress under oath that the military has intact vehicles “of exotic origin (non-human intelligence, whether extraterrestrial or unknown origin) based on the vehicle morphologies and material science testing and the possession of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures”.
Lying to congress that way would be a way to confuse the Chinese but it results people in Congress trying to engage with secret military programs in a way that the military doesn’t like. While some lies to Congress don’t get prosecuted, incorrectly telling Congress that the US military has intact vehicles of exotic origin seems like the kind of lie that Congressmen would want to see punished. It seems to me like a very strange conspiracy theory that the US military would purposefully mislead congress in this way.
based on the vehicle morphologies and material science testing and the possession of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures
That only sounds impressive if you don’t think too hard about what it means. It’s saying that the fragments are made of a fancy alloy that they can’t identify. But every military contractor has materials scientists, and being made of fancy new alloys is completely expected for cutting edge military aircraft.
The thing that has to be explained is why serious intelligence professionals speak of likely non-human origin.
It’s either:
(1) The US military/intelligence community is made up of people who are really crazy.
(2) There are actual aliens
(3) It’s a strange disinformation campaign that seems to go counter to the core interests of the military/intelligence community. It’s damaging to public and congressional trust in the military and invites oversight.
(4) There are some really strange turf wars going on in the military/intelligence community.
(5) There’s some other secret that’s even more strange to be covered up like psychic powers being responsible for the observed objects.
I don’t recall the source, but I do recall having seen a public source saying: The US air force had a problem with pilots getting buzzed by foreign drones, and not reporting the incidents because of stigma around UFOs. An executive decision was made to solve the problem by removing the stigma.
That seems to be a public justification for why the AATIP was started in 2007. It’s worth noting that the US air force didn’t want AATIP. Harry Reid forced them to do it because Robert Bigelow encouraged him to do so.
AATIP seems to come up with the term UAP to remove the stigma associated with the term UFO. That does not explain why AATIP reported having found the strange incidents that it found.
It certainly does not explain the reporting of a 90-year coverup of programs to retrieve UFOs. That’s not the kind of news you would want to produce if you want to reduce stigma.
The military released some videos but there’s plenty of reporting that it didn’t released their best-quality videos precisely for the reasons you listed. Having the best quality videos that are taking by fighter jets would reveal information about the fighter jets that the US military does not want out on the open so those high-quality videos are classified in a way the videos we have aren’t.
The kind of people who are in the know and who are qualified to interpret those videos are military personnel. People like David Charles Grusch.
There’s no good reason why someone like David Grusch should falsely tell Congress under oath that the military has intact vehicles “of exotic origin (non-human intelligence, whether extraterrestrial or unknown origin) based on the vehicle morphologies and material science testing and the possession of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures”.
Lying to congress that way would be a way to confuse the Chinese but it results people in Congress trying to engage with secret military programs in a way that the military doesn’t like. While some lies to Congress don’t get prosecuted, incorrectly telling Congress that the US military has intact vehicles of exotic origin seems like the kind of lie that Congressmen would want to see punished. It seems to me like a very strange conspiracy theory that the US military would purposefully mislead congress in this way.
That only sounds impressive if you don’t think too hard about what it means. It’s saying that the fragments are made of a fancy alloy that they can’t identify. But every military contractor has materials scientists, and being made of fancy new alloys is completely expected for cutting edge military aircraft.
The thing that has to be explained is why serious intelligence professionals speak of likely non-human origin.
It’s either:
(1) The US military/intelligence community is made up of people who are really crazy.
(2) There are actual aliens
(3) It’s a strange disinformation campaign that seems to go counter to the core interests of the military/intelligence community. It’s damaging to public and congressional trust in the military and invites oversight.
(4) There are some really strange turf wars going on in the military/intelligence community.
(5) There’s some other secret that’s even more strange to be covered up like psychic powers being responsible for the observed objects.
None of the explanations passes the smell test.
I don’t recall the source, but I do recall having seen a public source saying: The US air force had a problem with pilots getting buzzed by foreign drones, and not reporting the incidents because of stigma around UFOs. An executive decision was made to solve the problem by removing the stigma.
That seems to be a public justification for why the AATIP was started in 2007. It’s worth noting that the US air force didn’t want AATIP. Harry Reid forced them to do it because Robert Bigelow encouraged him to do so.
AATIP seems to come up with the term UAP to remove the stigma associated with the term UFO. That does not explain why AATIP reported having found the strange incidents that it found.
It certainly does not explain the reporting of a 90-year coverup of programs to retrieve UFOs. That’s not the kind of news you would want to produce if you want to reduce stigma.