To some degree. It might be more precise to say that many AI programs in general are a computational update to Carnap’s The Logical Structure of the World (1937).
But logical empiricism as a movement is basically dead, while what I’ve called Quinean naturalism is still a major force.
I’d actually say the central shared features that you’re identifying- the dissolving of the philosophical paradox instead of reifying it as well as the centrality of observation and science goes back to Hume.
To some degree. It might be more precise to say that many AI programs in general are a computational update to Carnap’s The Logical Structure of the World (1937).
But logical empiricism as a movement is basically dead, while what I’ve called Quinean naturalism is still a major force.
I’d actually say the central shared features that you’re identifying- the dissolving of the philosophical paradox instead of reifying it as well as the centrality of observation and science goes back to Hume.