I believe labels matter, and I believe the label “preparedness framework” is better than the label “responsible scaling policy.” Kudos to OpenAI on this. I hope we move past the RSP label.
I think labels will matter most when communicating to people who are not following the discussion closely (e.g., tech policy folks who have a portfolio of 5+ different issues and are not reading the RSPs or PFs in great detail).
One thing I like about the label “preparedness framework” is that it begs the question “prepared for what?”, which is exactly the kind of question I want policy people to be asking. PFs imply that there might be something scary that we are trying to prepare for.
I believe labels matter, and I believe the label “preparedness framework” is better than the label “responsible scaling policy.” Kudos to OpenAI on this. I hope we move past the RSP label.
I think labels will matter most when communicating to people who are not following the discussion closely (e.g., tech policy folks who have a portfolio of 5+ different issues and are not reading the RSPs or PFs in great detail).
One thing I like about the label “preparedness framework” is that it begs the question “prepared for what?”, which is exactly the kind of question I want policy people to be asking. PFs imply that there might be something scary that we are trying to prepare for.