I imagine this is the case per case of successful recovery. But a lot of people die such that their organs aren’t recovered. That obviously needs to be factored in.
**On edit- It occurs to me that a lot of the cases where organs aren’t recovered are also cases where cryogenic preservation wouldn’t be possible. So I might be wrong about this. Maybe 3.75 is the right number to use.
Can someone think of cases where preservation is possible but organ recovery isn’t?**
Can someone think of cases where preservation is possible but organ recovery isn’t?
Elderly patient suffering organ failure due to aging. Death by cancer (not of the brain). Potential donor had HIV or othervery dangerous infectious diseases. Severe abdominal trauma.
I imagine this is the case per case of successful recovery. But a lot of people die such that their organs aren’t recovered. That obviously needs to be factored in.
**On edit- It occurs to me that a lot of the cases where organs aren’t recovered are also cases where cryogenic preservation wouldn’t be possible. So I might be wrong about this. Maybe 3.75 is the right number to use.
Can someone think of cases where preservation is possible but organ recovery isn’t?**
Elderly patient suffering organ failure due to aging. Death by cancer (not of the brain). Potential donor had HIV or othervery dangerous infectious diseases. Severe abdominal trauma.
Probably other stuff, too.