And I told you that you haven’t made a case that suggests that it’s worth reading.
Induction was refuted decades ago and you guys aren’t updating and don’t have a mechanism to become less wrong about this.
How do you know that we aren’t updating? It seems to me like you are using induction to make that assessment. You observe that we don’t update towards your arguments and you conclude that we don’t update in general.
And I told you that you haven’t made a case that suggests that it’s worth reading.
How do you know that we aren’t updating? It seems to me like you are using induction to make that assessment. You observe that we don’t update towards your arguments and you conclude that we don’t update in general.