For me it’s very difficult to follow the text without asking myself: “What are you arguing at the moment? What’s the position against which you are arguing?”
But that makes it hard to critique. “The strongest argument” was not a very strong argument at all, which put the rest of the article on very shaky ground.
From what perspective would it be improved? Because there’s a reason there’s no definition in the essay...
For me it’s very difficult to follow the text without asking myself: “What are you arguing at the moment? What’s the position against which you are arguing?”
You’re starting to see the weakest point of the whole essay ^_^
But that makes it hard to critique. “The strongest argument” was not a very strong argument at all, which put the rest of the article on very shaky ground.