No. They discuss some of the other possibilities. For example, you don’t get the autocorrelation from other sampling methods like importance sampling or ABC sampling, which are drawing points independently of each other. They also mention particle sampling but I’m not sure how particle sampling vs classic MCMC would yield any observable psychological differences.
It doesn’t necessarily mean exactly the same biases since you could deliberately implement the opposite bias in some of those cases. But it suggests that such algorithms will consistently have overall a similar set of biases.
Wow. Does the result mean that any algorithm generating hypotheses via sampling will have the same biases?
No. They discuss some of the other possibilities. For example, you don’t get the autocorrelation from other sampling methods like importance sampling or ABC sampling, which are drawing points independently of each other. They also mention particle sampling but I’m not sure how particle sampling vs classic MCMC would yield any observable psychological differences.
It doesn’t necessarily mean exactly the same biases since you could deliberately implement the opposite bias in some of those cases. But it suggests that such algorithms will consistently have overall a similar set of biases.