You ignore that smart etc. people have to be able to distinguish between fuzzies and reality. Without a marketplace to weed out poor performers, this is wishful thinking.
I’m not sure what position you are arguing against but I am sure it is not mine.
I live in Europe...
I live in Australia but am visiting Berkeley. I am not sure why this is relevant either.
I’m sorry me message didn’t come across clearly. I can see it’s not phrased well.
I’m immensely skeptical of the notion that clever people are needed to tell dumb people what to do to achieve what they want; to “harness the capitalist system”. Mostly because so-called smart people have multiple other flaws that mainly stem from their not participating in or acknowledging the marketplace.
Many (public/social) intellectuals have such poor understanding of basic issues of economics, psychology and evolution that their prescribed cures worsen the ailment.
Which is why I mentioned Europe, a moribound continent which doesn’t seem to understand that it has to produce stuff to consume stuff and which appears to value appearances and ‘ethical policies’ over facing economic reality.
Save for problems regarding the tragedy of the commons, I see little hope for centralized harnessing by clever people. I see socialism as the economic variant of creationism: the notion that good, complex things cannot arise without central planning.
Caveat lector: I’m reading Atlas Shrugged right now.
I’m immensely skeptical of the notion that clever people are needed to tell dumb people what to do to achieve what they want
Every system ever devised consists of smart people telling the dumb ones what to do. Even in feudal society with hereditary rule, the thicker-than-brick kings were manipulated by smart barons and courtiers :-P
Caveat lector: I’m reading Atlas Shrugged right now.
Every system ever devised consists of smart people telling the dumb ones what to do. Even in feudal society with hereditary rule, the thicker-than-brick kings were manipulated by smart barons and courtiers :-P
I’d venture capitalism less so than other systems. At least dumb people to some extent get what they want in capitalism. But of course, this is one aspect of nature that’s very difficult to remedy and I worry that the cure is worse than the ailment
Caveat lector: I’m reading Atlas Shrugged right now.
Generalization from fictional evidence
I meant it as an explanation of my current dismal perspective, not as evidence of anything. Sorry if it didn’t come across right.
I’m immensely skeptical of the notion that clever people are needed to tell dumb people what to do to achieve what they want; to “harness the capitalist system”.
You ‘harness the capitalist system’ by participating in it, selling stuff, acquiring resources and exchanging those resources to achieve your goals. (And those goals can be selfish, altruistic or as arbitrary and nonsensical as you please.)
I see little hope for centralized harnessing by clever people
That is the position that I was “sure was not mine”.
I say the marketplace and the economic engine behind it are out there, ready and waiting to be exploited by anyone with the ambition and competence to do so. It is a tool which can be used to translate whatever comparative advantage you have into the most efficient goal-maximisation that you can manage.
I took “harness the capitalist system and the dumb people’s desires in such a way that they can achieve their own desires” as a paternalistic statement.
I took “harness the capitalist system and the dumb people’s desires in such a way that they can achieve their own desires” as a paternalistic statement.
I’m not sure what position you are arguing against but I am sure it is not mine.
I live in Australia but am visiting Berkeley. I am not sure why this is relevant either.
I’m sorry me message didn’t come across clearly. I can see it’s not phrased well.
I’m immensely skeptical of the notion that clever people are needed to tell dumb people what to do to achieve what they want; to “harness the capitalist system”. Mostly because so-called smart people have multiple other flaws that mainly stem from their not participating in or acknowledging the marketplace.
Many (public/social) intellectuals have such poor understanding of basic issues of economics, psychology and evolution that their prescribed cures worsen the ailment.
Which is why I mentioned Europe, a moribound continent which doesn’t seem to understand that it has to produce stuff to consume stuff and which appears to value appearances and ‘ethical policies’ over facing economic reality.
Save for problems regarding the tragedy of the commons, I see little hope for centralized harnessing by clever people. I see socialism as the economic variant of creationism: the notion that good, complex things cannot arise without central planning.
Caveat lector: I’m reading Atlas Shrugged right now.
Every system ever devised consists of smart people telling the dumb ones what to do. Even in feudal society with hereditary rule, the thicker-than-brick kings were manipulated by smart barons and courtiers :-P
Generalization from fictional evidence
I’d venture capitalism less so than other systems. At least dumb people to some extent get what they want in capitalism. But of course, this is one aspect of nature that’s very difficult to remedy and I worry that the cure is worse than the ailment
I meant it as an explanation of my current dismal perspective, not as evidence of anything. Sorry if it didn’t come across right.
You ‘harness the capitalist system’ by participating in it, selling stuff, acquiring resources and exchanging those resources to achieve your goals. (And those goals can be selfish, altruistic or as arbitrary and nonsensical as you please.)
That is the position that I was “sure was not mine”.
I say the marketplace and the economic engine behind it are out there, ready and waiting to be exploited by anyone with the ambition and competence to do so. It is a tool which can be used to translate whatever comparative advantage you have into the most efficient goal-maximisation that you can manage.
Sorry for jumping to conclusions.
I took “harness the capitalist system and the dumb people’s desires in such a way that they can achieve their own desires” as a paternalistic statement.
Nope, just Machiavellian. ;)