I did not say that resolution limitations could be overcome by just taking more data.
I did say that unsystematic noise can be dealt with by taking more data. This should not be controversial; it is standard procedure and for most kinds of noise it works extremely well. (For some kinds of noise the right way to use the extra data is more sophisticated than e.g. just averaging. There are possible noise conditions where no amount of extra data will help you because there is literally no information at all in your measurements, but that is not the situation the EHT is facing.)
You keep talking about “hard limits” and “cardinal sins” but I don’t think you have understood the material you are looking at well enough to make those claims.
I did not say that resolution limitations could be overcome by just taking more data.
I did say that unsystematic noise can be dealt with by taking more data. This should not be controversial; it is standard procedure and for most kinds of noise it works extremely well. (For some kinds of noise the right way to use the extra data is more sophisticated than e.g. just averaging. There are possible noise conditions where no amount of extra data will help you because there is literally no information at all in your measurements, but that is not the situation the EHT is facing.)
You keep talking about “hard limits” and “cardinal sins” but I don’t think you have understood the material you are looking at well enough to make those claims.