I feel like the point you should be making is that there are some pitfalls to Bayesian methods which need more attention. Instead the piece comes across as a sarcastic denouncement of Bayesian methods in general as insufficiently scientific.
In general Bayesian methods have proved to be incredibly powerful tools and I worry you’re throwing out the baby with the bath water.
I feel like the point you should be making is that there are some pitfalls to Bayesian methods which need more attention. Instead the piece comes across as a sarcastic denouncement of Bayesian methods in general as insufficiently scientific.
In general Bayesian methods have proved to be incredibly powerful tools and I worry you’re throwing out the baby with the bath water.