speaking only for myself—I have both upvoted and downvoted various of your posts, but mostly ignored them. I’d intended to ignore this as well, but since you ask...
“disapprove” is the wrong word. I wish you luck and success in raising the sanity waterline. I am voting more along the lines of “this isn’t why I come to LessWrong”. It would be fine in bragging or media threads, or if you started a monthly “outreach” post that’d be fine too. But I ’d rather see fewer top-level posts that don’t have a direct point or actual question for debate.
speaking only for myself—I have both upvoted and downvoted various of your posts, but mostly ignored them. I’d intended to ignore this as well, but since you ask...
“disapprove” is the wrong word. I wish you luck and success in raising the sanity waterline. I am voting more along the lines of “this isn’t why I come to LessWrong”. It would be fine in bragging or media threads, or if you started a monthly “outreach” post that’d be fine too. But I ’d rather see fewer top-level posts that don’t have a direct point or actual question for debate.
Thanks for letting me know! I hope some of the upcoming changes to the LW infrastructure will allow more clear delineation of posts.
Just chuck em in an open thread instead
Oh, and here’s an idea—I’ll put a [Outreach] in the title before future posts to clarify things so that people don’t click on it if they don’t wish.