I neither accept or deny the ideas presented but I do believe you are tapping into something greater. It seems most dislike your theory because it doesn’t follow modern western philosophy.
I should have expressed that western philosophy may be a reason we view the idea as ‘bad’ on first glance. Further investigation of the comment reveals it is logically flawed but that initial negative feeling is a bias we cannot ignore. Is our own philosophy of enlightenment altering our perception? That is a question that comes to mind from the whole ordeal.
I neither accept or deny the ideas presented but I do believe you are tapping into something greater. It seems most dislike your theory because it doesn’t follow modern western philosophy.
I should have expressed that western philosophy may be a reason we view the idea as ‘bad’ on first glance. Further investigation of the comment reveals it is logically flawed but that initial negative feeling is a bias we cannot ignore. Is our own philosophy of enlightenment altering our perception? That is a question that comes to mind from the whole ordeal.
It’s a question about value, not fact. “Bias” is not even a criticism here; value is nothing but bias.