Though I agree, they do a decent job pointing out that whatever “statistics” the Fraser institute puts out is largely ideologically motivated. Duh, like they were ever hiding it.
As are those that the article substitutes. They choose a different measure of “size of government” and get a conclusion that they prefer. Would they have stuck with that measure if it had gone the other way?
As are those that the article substitutes. They choose a different measure of “size of government” and get a conclusion that they prefer. Would they have stuck with that measure if it had gone the other way?