I wonder whether John believes that well-liked research, e.g. Fabien’s list, is actually not valuable or rare exceptions coming from a small subset of the “alignment research” field.
I strongly suspect he thinks most of it is not valuable
I wonder whether John believes that well-liked research, e.g. Fabien’s list, is actually not valuable or rare exceptions coming from a small subset of the “alignment research” field.
I strongly suspect he thinks most of it is not valuable