That’s actually a fair point, although I’m not sure how much it takes away from the value of the metaphor.It looks to me it can be easily circumvented while mantaining the general idea.
A classical allusion you might have used instead is “bleggs and rubes.”
Yup, hadn’t read that. Definitely relevant. Thanks!
That’s actually a fair point, although I’m not sure how much it takes away from the value of the metaphor.It looks to me it can be easily circumvented while mantaining the general idea.
A classical allusion you might have used instead is “bleggs and rubes.”
Yup, hadn’t read that. Definitely relevant. Thanks!