I’d enjoy (perhaps, it’ll depend on what you actually mean) more exploration of the specifics of your shared truth-seeking with your fellow artists about generative ML models. I don’t think it makes for very good general discussion until you have some successes on smaller, more direct interactions.
I am a bit concerned about your framing of how to “educate” the public or your fellow artists, rather than any sort of cooperative or agency-respecting mechanisms.
“educate” is used here because I found these kinds of discussions would not be easily conducted if the AI part were introduced before any actual progress can be made. Or, to frame it that way, my fellow tends to panic if they are introduced to generative ML models and related artwork advancements, and refuse to listen to any technical explanation that might make them more understood. There was no manipulative intention, and I’m willing to change my interaction method if the current one seems manipulative.
I’d enjoy (perhaps, it’ll depend on what you actually mean) more exploration of the specifics of your shared truth-seeking with your fellow artists about generative ML models. I don’t think it makes for very good general discussion until you have some successes on smaller, more direct interactions.
I am a bit concerned about your framing of how to “educate” the public or your fellow artists, rather than any sort of cooperative or agency-respecting mechanisms.
“educate” is used here because I found these kinds of discussions would not be easily conducted if the AI part were introduced before any actual progress can be made. Or, to frame it that way, my fellow tends to panic if they are introduced to generative ML models and related artwork advancements, and refuse to listen to any technical explanation that might make them more understood. There was no manipulative intention, and I’m willing to change my interaction method if the current one seems manipulative.