Your description of altruistic players is therefore incorrect
Yeah, it’s a very simplified version of altruism. I understand that real altruism in the wild does not look like adding another’s utility function to one’s own (which one somehow has read access to).
The 11+10i meat/no-meat result is utility ONLY if it includes all of the other crap that goes on in our minds to evaluate world-states
No I’m saying: assume that the payoff matrix I’ve written down is correct for the situation in which some outside entity chooses each player’s actions for them. This whole post is basically about how the “other crap” changes the payoff matrix when they players have to take responsibility for picking the actions themselves.
If it’s just a component, then there’s no reason to believe it’s linear, nor that it’s independent of all the other things.
I know what linearity and statistical independence are, but I don’t know what you mean by this.
Yeah, it’s a very simplified version of altruism. I understand that real altruism in the wild does not look like adding another’s utility function to one’s own (which one somehow has read access to).
No I’m saying: assume that the payoff matrix I’ve written down is correct for the situation in which some outside entity chooses each player’s actions for them. This whole post is basically about how the “other crap” changes the payoff matrix when they players have to take responsibility for picking the actions themselves.
I know what linearity and statistical independence are, but I don’t know what you mean by this.