Except that based on videos and letters left behind, the hijackers considered Americans to be not just intellectual adversaries, but wartime ones. I believe the majority of the hijackers cited American military presence in the Middle East and military and economic support of Israel to that effect.
So what were the specific arguments they used when persuading acolytes of the great satan that their position has more merit? Or was it confined to “BOOM!”?
Except that based on videos and letters left behind, the hijackers considered Americans to be not just intellectual adversaries, but wartime ones. I believe the majority of the hijackers cited American military presence in the Middle East and military and economic support of Israel to that effect.
So what were the specific arguments they used when persuading acolytes of the great satan that their position has more merit? Or was it confined to “BOOM!”?
My point is that using violence to silence intellectual adversaries is very different from using violence against a perceived wartime enemy.