Binmore is on something of a “Hume is God, Kant is Satan” kick in this book. Another quote I like deals with Binmore’s efforts to comprehend the “categorical imperative”:
It eventually dawned on me that I was reading the work of an emperor who was clothed in nothing more than the obscurity of his prose.
I share much of Binmore’s enthusiasm for Hume. I don’t think that rationalists have much reason to dislike Hume’s skepticism. Hume was a practical man, and his famous argument against induction is far from a counsel of epistemological despair. As for instructing the young to be skeptical of gods—well it may violate the US Constitution, but then so does gun control. ;)
Nonetheless, I suspect that many people here would not care much for this particular quote in its full context—starting a couple paragraphs before my quote and continuing a paragraph further.
Binmore is on something of a “Hume is God, Kant is Satan” kick in this book. Another quote I like deals with Binmore’s efforts to comprehend the “categorical imperative”:
I share much of Binmore’s enthusiasm for Hume. I don’t think that rationalists have much reason to dislike Hume’s skepticism. Hume was a practical man, and his famous argument against induction is far from a counsel of epistemological despair. As for instructing the young to be skeptical of gods—well it may violate the US Constitution, but then so does gun control. ;)
Nonetheless, I suspect that many people here would not care much for this particular quote in its full context—starting a couple paragraphs before my quote and continuing a paragraph further.