If people obtain 70% information through vision, and might allocate more significance to negative feedback than to positive one, why do lecturers never bind their eyes?
If people obtain 70% information through vision
What does that even mean?
why do lecturers never bind their eyes?
Eye contact is part of good public speaking. It useful to perceive one’s audience and see when it get’s confused.
If someone is afraid, binding their eyes is not likely to reduce anxiety.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
If people obtain 70% information through vision, and might allocate more significance to negative feedback than to positive one, why do lecturers never bind their eyes?
What does that even mean?
Eye contact is part of good public speaking. It useful to perceive one’s audience and see when it get’s confused.
If someone is afraid, binding their eyes is not likely to reduce anxiety.