Only the second to last link seems to be in the same category of this post (it talks about risk-aversion in investments more generally, while I’m talking more specifically about startups here).
My previous post was about the likelihood of startup success. This post takes chances at success as a given, and asks the question of whether those chances justify an effective altruist starting a startup.
I think this has come up several times before, and I note that the last link is to a post by you a month ago. What do you think is different now?
Only the second to last link seems to be in the same category of this post (it talks about risk-aversion in investments more generally, while I’m talking more specifically about startups here).
My previous post was about the likelihood of startup success. This post takes chances at success as a given, and asks the question of whether those chances justify an effective altruist starting a startup.
For any of them, if you search the phrase “startup,” you will find discussion of this issue either in the post, or in the comments.