The LessWrong Review runs every year to select the posts that have most stood the test of time. This post is not yet eligible for review, but will be at the end of 2025. The top fifty or so posts are featured prominently on the site throughout the year.
Hopefully, the review is better than karma at judging enduring value. If we have accurate prediction markets on the review results, maybe we can have better incentives on LessWrong today. Will this post make the top fifty?
Interestingly: I think this post should score highly in the review, and I think a fair number of people will upvote it, but in practice the way it seems to go is that sequences get one representative post that scores highly, and probably this one won’t be it.
The LessWrong Review runs every year to select the posts that have most stood the test of time. This post is not yet eligible for review, but will be at the end of 2025. The top fifty or so posts are featured prominently on the site throughout the year.
Hopefully, the review is better than karma at judging enduring value. If we have accurate prediction markets on the review results, maybe we can have better incentives on LessWrong today. Will this post make the top fifty?
Interestingly: I think this post should score highly in the review, and I think a fair number of people will upvote it, but in practice the way it seems to go is that sequences get one representative post that scores highly, and probably this one won’t be it.