Neither did I. (Note the difference between “more than” and “equally with”.)
You said that he should care about “other people”, without you distinguishing between classes of people. This implies that you don’t think he cares about other people now. Phrased that way, that implies you think he doesn’t care about other people in general, not about non-friend other people. All of your arguments apply to people in general anyway.
But he never said that. He cares for some other people (his friends). He just doesn’t care for other people equally. EA is weird, and most people don’t share belief in it.
My use of the term “you” when I said “why should you care about other people” (and the rest of the post for that matter) was a stylistic use in the global sense, not personally directed at him.
Neither did I. (Note the difference between “more than” and “equally with”.)
You said that he should care about “other people”, without you distinguishing between classes of people. This implies that you don’t think he cares about other people now. Phrased that way, that implies you think he doesn’t care about other people in general, not about non-friend other people. All of your arguments apply to people in general anyway.
But he never said that. He cares for some other people (his friends). He just doesn’t care for other people equally. EA is weird, and most people don’t share belief in it.
My use of the term “you” when I said “why should you care about other people” (and the rest of the post for that matter) was a stylistic use in the global sense, not personally directed at him.
The context seems to indicate otherwise.